Re: [foxboro] FBM 10 with FBM 13 Extender

We've had similar issues and MPOLL was the culprit, didn't' seems to work
this time but could there be something related?  What is the purpose of
MPOLL?

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Brian Long
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 2:52 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] FBM 10 with FBM 13 Extender

Yes, we took all the hardware and installed on another node, everything
worked just fine.  It seems to be related to just this CP.  We even
load_all'd and didn't help.

Thanks, 
Brian

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Douglas G. Lloyd
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 1:13 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] FBM 10 with FBM 13 Extender

Brian,

Just a quick thought, did you identify the EXTYPE on the ECB block??

         NAME    XXXXXX                            BUSWDS  0
          TYPE    ECB8                              FPM08   0
          DESCRP                                    FSMM08  0
          PERIOD  1                                 FSDM08  0XC0
          PHASE   0                                 FPE08   0
          DEV_ID  XXXXXX                            FSME08  0
          HWTYPE  10                                FSDE08  0
          SWTYPE  8                                 OVRDIS  0
          EXTYPE  13                                SIMOPT  0
          FSENAB  1                                 SIMCIN  0x0
          FSDLAY  1000                              END

Regards,

Doug Lloyd
DGL Controls

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Brian Long
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 2:03 PM
To: Foxboro
Subject: [foxboro] FBM 10 with FBM 13 Extender

We are unable to get an FBM10 with 13 extender to go online.  (FBM downloads
and EEPROMS)  All the hardware seems to be ok, new FBM's, Y adapter,
nosecones and letterbugs.  We added a new rack with new FBI's thinking we
have a backplane issue.  This is an existing pair that has been installed
for a number of years, running on a CP40B hosted by an AW51B box at 6.5.3.
There are other CP's that have similar working pairs hosted by this box.
Foxboro has no solution at this time. 
 
Any ideas would be helpful.  We've already split the pair up (installed two
single FBM10's) and are back running.

Thanks,

Brain Long

Arkansas Kraft


 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 


 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 


 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

Other related posts: