Re: [foxboro] Determining Forces in PLB
- From: "tjvandew@xxxxxxxxx" <tjvandew@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:33:34 -0500
David,
You are so right about that. We just finished a 500+ I/O conversion
from CP-30's and 60 to ZCP and 200 series IO and almost every discrete
100 series FBM used an extended one and all were running ladder logic.
We are doing another 600+ at midyear and have more to deal with. We are
eliminating as many ladders as possible then also. It is a lot of work.
Luckily we are using Esscors FSIM + SIM4ME so we can configure and
test all of our Control Configuration offline including the FBM
emulation before we shutdown for the cutover. That has been a godsend
and insures that we haven't mis-configured anything. The FSIM Virtual
CP even emulates/executes the ladder logic. We have a few instances
where we actually need the speed that ladder logic provides, mostly to
catch when field mounted momentary pushbuttons are used to shutdown or
start equipment.
Tom
David Johnson wrote:
> Tom,
>
> How I love PLB let me count the ways.....
> Another thing that is turning into a bit of a headache is migrating
> 100 series ladders that are in 10/15, 10/13 or 8/15, 8/13
> extenders. Seems there's no 200 series equivalent to the extender
> modules, so you have to re-write and re-path a fair amount of plb
> ladder. Although it seems straightforward, and in some cases it is,
> it can be a real bear, and causes a lot of re-testing.
>
> Regards,
> David
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] Determining Forces in PLB
- From: David R. Johnson
- References:
- [foxboro] Determining Forces in PLB
- From: David Johnson
- Re: [foxboro] Determining Forces in PLB
- From: tom.vandewater
- Re: [foxboro] Determining Forces in PLB
- From: David Johnson
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Determining Forces in PLB
- » Re: [foxboro] Determining Forces in PLB
- » Re: [foxboro] Determining Forces in PLB
- » Re: [foxboro] Determining Forces in PLB
- » Re: [foxboro] Determining Forces in PLB
- » Re: [foxboro] Determining Forces in PLB
- » Re: [foxboro] Determining Forces in PLB
- » Re: [foxboro] Determining Forces in PLB
- » Re: [foxboro] Determining Forces in PLB
- » Re: [foxboro] Determining Forces in PLB
- » Re: [foxboro] Determining Forces in PLB
- Re: [foxboro] Determining Forces in PLB
- From: David R. Johnson
- [foxboro] Determining Forces in PLB
- From: David Johnson
- Re: [foxboro] Determining Forces in PLB
- From: tom.vandewater
- Re: [foxboro] Determining Forces in PLB
- From: David Johnson