Re: [foxboro] DMCplus platform, migration path
- From: MUGARTET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 12:06:35 -0300
I think my question was misunderstood: on the I/A boxes (all 51D's in =
our
case) we are using DMCplus Bridge. We use GCS on the "office" WIN2K =
machines
for control engineers, normally for remote troubleshooting. My problem =
is
that I got GCS to work for the DMC's we have installed on ABB Advant =
system
but not for the I/A machines. As I see it now, it is just a problem of
configuration, since everybody else seems to be using it with DMC's =
running
on I/A. That is why I was asking for advice on how to configure the =
GCS.
Sorry for the misunderstanding.
By the way, and just for the record, I prefer I/A by far and for a lot =
of
good reasons over ABB's Advant...
Regards.
Mart=EDn R. Ugarte
Control Avanzado y Sistemas
Refiner=EDa La Plata - RepsolYPF
* +54-221-4298310 ext. 28034
7 +54-221-4298310 ext. 28033
* <mailto:mugartet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Johnson, Alex (Foxboro) [mailto:ajohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Enviado el: Mi=E9rcoles, 25 de Septiembre de 2002 11:50 a.m.
Para: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Asunto: Re: [foxboro] DMCplus platform, migration path
Re: I am not sure if ApsenTech makes a Unix version of GCS.
The DMCplus Bridge (Solaris only at this point) exists in part because =
GCS
does not support Solaris.
Regards,
Alex Johnson
Invensys
10707 Haddington
Houston, TX 77063
713.722.2859 (office)
713.722.2700 (switchboard)
713.932.0222 (fax)
ajohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ajohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx>=20
-----Original Message-----
From: Loupe, Rory (RJ) [SMTP:RJLoupe@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:02 AM
To: 'foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: Re: [foxboro] DMCplus platform, migration path
We only have the Windows version of GCS and it is installed on WIN98
systems. All of our I/A WPs are 50 series Unix boxes. I am not
sure if
ApsenTech makes a Unix version of GCS. If the Windows version of
GCS can be
installed on an NT system then there is no reason this would not
work on a
WP70. The control engineers are the only ones using GCS from our
Windows
"business" workstation.
Rory
-----Original Message-----
From: MUGARTET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:MUGARTET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:12 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] DMCplus platform, migration path
Rory,
Have you been able to use GCS Opcon on I/A platform? If so, can you
give me
guidelines on how to do it. I thought it was not possible, or at
least that
was what I understood from the documentation...
Martin
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Loupe, Rory (RJ) [mailto:RJLoupe@xxxxxxx]
Enviado el: Martes, 24 de Septiembre de 2002 11:41 a.m.
Para: 'foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Asunto: Re: [foxboro] DMCplus platform, migration path
ApsenTech sells a CIMIO for Foxboro I/A interface. It uses the
local FoxAPI
on the AW, therefore there is nothing additional to purchase from
Foxboro.
This would allow you to read and write tags between a CIMIO device
(DMCPlus,
IP21, RTO, etc...) and I/A. So, the controllers could be built and
run on
the NT box.
Now the trick is the operator interface because you can no longer
use DMC
bridge graphics. There are a few options as I see it. 1. Create
the
graphics on I/A (maybe using reusable displays for similar
controllers) 2.
Create the graphics with ApsenTech Process Explorer (will require a
PC for
each operator console) 3. Use AspenTech Web Viewer for DMCPlus
(requires a
separate NT box and PC for each operator console with MS IE) 4.
Use
ApsenTech legacy GCS OpCon (Yuck!)
I prefer option 1 if you have the time or option 3 if you have the
$$$$$$$$$!
Rory
-----Original Message-----
From: GopanNair@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:GopanNair@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 6:31 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] DMCplus platform, migration path
We currently run DMCplus 1.11 on Foxboro I/A Ver 4.3 on AW51
series
stations. While exploring the
upgrade strategies, we came to know that Foxboro has migrated the
DMC
applications to Connoisseur ,
whereas Aspentech has their latest DMC plus 4.x
This latest DMC engine runs on Windows NT platform , which could
not be
integrated to I/A Nodebus.
The possible workaround is to have an AW on the Nodebus to Interact
with
the NT machine. The AW
on the Nodebus will have to act as the DMC bridge running AOS and
API,
which will also be hosting the
operator graphics on the WP's on the Nodebus. In this setup, one
needs to
build the models on the
off-line NT machine and manually transfer the controller files to
the AW .
We are looking at a full-fledged solution using on-line DMCplus
Controllers .
Your comments are welcome.
________________
Thanks & Regards,
GOPAN.G.NAIR
Senior Systems Engineer
Saudi Aramco-Mobil Refinery
Yanbu, Saudi Arabia
ph: 966-4-3964738
fax: 966-4-3964647
email : GopanNair@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
=20
=20
=09
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys
Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here
at
your own risks. Read
http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=20
foxboro mailing list:
http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe:
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=20
=20
=20
=09
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys
Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here
at
your own risks. Read
http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=20
foxboro mailing list:
http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe:
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=20
=20
=20
=09
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys
Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here
at
your own risks. Read
http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=20
foxboro mailing list:
http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe:
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=20
=20
=20
=09
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys
Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here
at
your own risks. Read
http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=20
foxboro mailing list:
http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe:
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=20
=20
=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=20
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe: =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts: