In Foxboro's defense (yes, I really said that :), it would be mostly this way with nearly any modern OS running on commodity PC hardware**. The places I see it being more difficult than it has to (in this particular scenario) are: 1. Commercial backup software packages not providing all the functionality you need, such that you have to buy two of them (Symantec/Acronis). 2. I/A software relying on MAC addresses of Ethernet cards. Yes, there's a registry hack to get around it, but hey, how about an automated tool? 3. Foxboro AIM* licensing being tied to the Windows SID. I realize they're worried about piracy, but we DCS guys have enough to worry about without being treated like criminals (which is an attitude not limited to Foxboro, for sure). At least on Suns you could swap the NVRAM chip. One of those hardware dongles might even be better here (with the option to have a backup for $100 or so). 4. Windows (and Microsoft zombies' ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H independent software developers') insistence on registry usage (Microsoft's 2nd worst idea ever, or maybe 1st worst, depending on how bad you think spaces in filenames, or Bob, or Windows Mobile, or...ok, I'll get on with it). Using .ini or other text configuration files makes this kind of thing MUCH easier. Unix has been making that work for years. I personally refuse to use the registry for any of my own programming. And movements like PortableApps.com (and similar commercial offerings) and liveCDs tell me that I'm not the only one tired of it. ** To completely get around this, I still think you have to use virtualization or something. Get your VMware ESX or Xen running on your new box, copy over your VM image that is your I/A installation, plug in dongles/enter license keys and go. But in your defense, Fritz, I too would rather jump out of windows than into Windows. Corey Clingo BASF Corporation "Schouten, Frits JF" <Frits.Schouten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 02/18/2009 03:20 PM Please respond to foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject Re: [foxboro] Convert a Foxboro P91 Server from a P91 Dell Power Edge 2800 to a new Dell Power Edge 2900 Thanks Tom, for this extensive procedure you just wrote. But when is the penny going to drop at FoxboroHQ(IPS), that Windoze is not the right platform in a Process Control Environment?!?!? Turning over the hardware every other year is just not acceptable. Well, that's my penny worth. Mind you a truly P&P Foxboro system sounds somewhat attractive. Cheers, Frits Schouten NZSteel. _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave