Re: [foxboro] Control loops per operator
- From: "Perez, Claudio" <CPerez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 14:51:47 -0300
Thanks Tom, for your reply.=20
I agree with you, this is a very good forum to exchange our ideas.
Regards
-----Mensaje original-----
De: tom.vandewater@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx =
[mailto:tom.vandewater@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Enviado el: Martes, 6 de Julio de 2004 12:48
Para: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Asunto: Re: [foxboro] Control loops per operator
Claudio,
There is a lot of discussion as to whether or not using a loop count
or # of controller count per operating technician is an effective way =
of
measuring technician utilization but I know it varies widely based on =
the
amount of control coordination and automation installed and it also =
makes a
big difference as to whether the processes are continuous like many
distillation trains, or batch like many reactor systems. I have an =
easy way
to document how many analog controllers, (such as PID, DGAP, PTC), each =
of
our operators are controlling and it ranges from 148 to 246 per =
operating
technician in our plant. That doesn't include any of the discrete
controllers used for discrete valves and motors but I have found that =
our
discrete functions are generally twice the number of the analog =
controllers
for our processes so you can do the math. I would be interested in =
hearing
comparisons from other plant operations throughout the world and this =
is a
great forum for it.
Via automation over the years the number of board operating
technicians required to run the plant has been reduced. This can allow =
the
freed up resources to focus more on improving the reliability of the =
field
equipment via increased preventive maintenance activities.
Tom VandeWater
Control Systems Developer/Analyst
Dow Corning Corporation
Carrollton, KY USA
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Perez, Claudio
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 11:25 AM
To: 'foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [foxboro] Control loops per operator
Gentlemen:
Do somebody have some figures about the right number of operators
per control loops (pid, hand controls, i/o, etc). Is there some =3D
standard to
follow? Till now I couldn't find good information.
Thanks in advance.
Claudio A. Perez
Control Systems Eng.
PROFERTIL S.A.
(54) 291 459-8139
cperez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.profertil.com.ar
Esta informaci=F3n es privada y confidencial y est=E1 dirigida =
=FAnicamente a su
destinatario. Si usted no es el destinatario original de este mensaje =
y por
este medio ha tenido acceso a dicha informaci=F3n, por favor elimine el
mensaje. La distribuci=F3n o copia de este mensaje est=E1 estrictamente
prohibida. Esta comunicaci=F3n es s=F3lo para prop=F3sitos de =
informaci=F3n y no
debe ser considerada como propuesta, aceptaci=F3n ni como una =
declaraci=F3n de
voluntad oficial emanada de Profertil S.A. La transmisi=F3n de e-mails =
no
garantiza que el correo electr=F3nico sea seguro o libre de error. Por
consiguiente, no manifestamos que esta informaci=F3n sea completa o =
precisa.
Toda informaci=F3n estar=E1 sujeta a alteraciones sin previo aviso.=20
This information is private and confidential and intended for the =
recipient
only. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are =
hereby
notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of =
this
message is strictly prohibited. This communication is for information
purposes only and shall not be regarded neither as a proposal, =
acceptance
nor as a statement of will or official statement from Profertil S.A. =
and/or
subsidiaries and/or affiliates. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed =
to
be secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this
information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as
such. All information is subject to change without notice.
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
