Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- From: Kevin FitzGerrell <fitzgerrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 10:30:24 +1300
Andreas,
A fairly straightforward way around this is to host CSA on a workstation
that is not a control station host and doesn't have a historian.
Backups can be limited to an initial backup when the machine is built,
and then just backup graphics and CSA without shuting the machine down.
Regards,
Kevin FitzGerrell
Carter Holt Harvey, Ltd.
+64 27 460 9994
Weiss, Andreas wrote:
>>If the Nodes are separate systems, you'll need to merge CSA=20
>>and reboot the
>>stations to get new addresses regardless of technique.
>>=20
>
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> the situation with one CSA only in one system is an annoying limitation.
>
> When will we get a multi master CSA system?
>
> One CSA only is a big limitation and prevents us from connecting bigger =
> networks together.
>
> It's still impossible to keep one CSA server 24 h x 265 days alive =
> because also an CSA server requires an backup and other maintenance =
> procedures. But what happens with people and scripts that work and run =
> in this moment?=20
> That is "easy" to manage in little networks but nearly impossible in big =
> networks. Ask the fileserver admins in your company how painful it is to =
> explain that a server needs to be shutdown. No one loves that and every =
> user hates the admin who done it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Andreas
>
>
> Andreas Weiss
> __________________________________________________________
> INNOVENE Deutschland GmbH
> PLS Prozessleitsysteme
> Alte Stra=DFe 201
> D - 50769 Koeln
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- From: Weiss, Andreas
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- From: Weiss, Andreas