Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- From: stan <stanb@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Johnson, Alex P (IPS)" <alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:05:13 -0500
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 03:43:55PM -0500, Johnson, Alex P (IPS) wrote:
> I don't know if they need it or not.
>
> But, it doesn't change the design goal of CSA, i.e., that the loss of CSA
> does not impair operation of the plant and that you can schedule access to
> CSA for your convenience.
>
Well, there is an assumption that the QF's for the DM 8 minute lockups,
when accessing trend data have been installed here, right?
--
U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite Vietcong
Terror
- New York Times 9/3/1967
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- From: Johnson, Alex P (IPS)
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- From: Johnson, Alex P (IPS)