Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- From: "Johnson, Alex P (IPS)" <alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:43:55 -0500
I don't know if they need it or not.
But, it doesn't change the design goal of CSA, i.e., that the loss of CSA
does not impair operation of the plant and that you can schedule access to
CSA for your convenience.
Regards,
Alex Johnson
Invensys Systems, Inc.
10900 Equity Drive
Houston, TX 77041
713.329.8472 (voice)
713.329.1700 (fax)
713.329.1600 (switchboard)
alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Weiss, Andreas
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 10:50 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
> The theory behind CSA is that it is needed only for=20
> configuration and that
> maintenance can be scheduled around that activity. Taking it down is
> supposed to have no impact on operations.
>=20
We run scripts every night. These scripts use iccprt and other iccdrvtsk
functionalities to extract the control station database and export it
into other formats.
I think that these tools didn't work without an CSA. I've never checked
it should I?
Regards,
Andreas
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- From: stan
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- From: stan