Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- From: "Weiss, Andreas" <Andreas.Weiss@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:49:35 -0600
> The theory behind CSA is that it is needed only for=20
> configuration and that
> maintenance can be scheduled around that activity. Taking it down is
> supposed to have no impact on operations.
>=20
We run scripts every night. These scripts use iccprt and other iccdrvtsk
functionalities to extract the control station database and export it
into other formats.
I think that these tools didn't work without an CSA. I've never checked
it should I?
Regards,
Andreas
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- [foxboro] One CSA? (was: Conectivity between nodes)
- From: Corey R Clingo
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- » Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- [foxboro] One CSA? (was: Conectivity between nodes)
- From: Corey R Clingo