Re: [foxboro] Cisco switches vs Interesys
- From: "Brennen, Robert SCAN--" <Robert.Brennen@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 08:24:19 -0600
Greetings,
We initially thought we would go with CISCO for the same reasons, but =
given the criticality of switches, we decided to go with the Invensys - =
Interesys switches. As it turned out, we had a problem with a switch, =
and I feel the problem resolution would not have been anywhere as =
effective had we not installed the Interesys equipment. This is one =
part of the system that I feel should not be a COTS device and highly =
recommend going the Invensys - Interesys route.
...regards
Robert Brennen
Project Lead - DCS Replacement Project
Shell Canada Limited
This email, any attachment and/or series of responses, is intended for =
the use of the recipient to which it is addressed, and may contain =
confidential, personal and/or privileged information. If you are not the =
intended recipient, telephone or email the sender and delete this =
message and any attachment immediately. Do not copy, distribute, or take =
action relying on it. Electronic communications over a public network =
are not secure and therefore Shell does not accept any legal =
responsibility for the contents of this message, including any damage =
caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of stan
> Sent: October 19, 2005 7:44 AM
> To: Foxboro List
> Subject: [foxboro] Cisco switches vs Interesys
>=20
>=20
> We are close to buying our second set of V7 hardware. On the=20
> first set we
> let Foxboro talk us into Interesys switches. The corporate=20
> standard, however
> is Cisco, and within our organization we certainly have more=20
> expertise in
> supporting these.
>=20
> I'd like to hear from other users as to which direction they=20
> are going, or
> are planing on going on this.
>=20
> Thanks.
>=20
> --=20
> U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout=20
> Despite Vietcong Terror=20
> - New York Times 9/3/1967
> =20
> =20
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by=20
> Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you=20
> obtain here at
> your own risks. Read=20
> http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
> =20
> foxboro mailing list: =20
> //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: =20
> mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
> to unsubscribe: =20
> mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
> =20
>=20
>=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
