Re: [foxboro] Check against entering ridiculous values

Adam,

there are certainly some options how to accomplish this. The most simple one 
might be to clamp the range (using SPHLIM, SPLLIM parameters of PIDA) where you 
can enter a setpoint. But this approach does not provide much flexebility in 
terms of
operation of this controller. On some occurances you might want to be able to 
enter a very low setpoint, what is then 
not possible. 
The second option takes care of this. You also can make this clamp depending on 
operating conditions, but this would require an additional CALC block, what 
changes the SPHLIM and SPLLIM parameters.
In our plant we are using a special PIDA overlay, what checks if the new 
entered setpoint deviates more than 10% from 
the old setpoint and notifies the operator.


Best Regards
Rocco 

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Adam.Pemberton@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 2:04 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] Check against entering ridiculous values


We had an incident on Saturday where an operator accidently entered a very low 
setpoint (5kPa when it should be >2200 kPa) on the pressure control for one of 
our Autoclaves. This caused the vent valve to open to 100% and the clave to 
rapidly depressurize. This is a potentially catastrophic incident since high 
venting in an Oxygen rich environment can cause a major fire.
 

We are at the final stages of a migration from Display Manager to FoxView. In 
order to help these guys with the transition, we have provided them with one 
Exceed XTerm running Display Manager off our engineering development AW.

 

This incident illustrated a number of issues :

   - The operator claimed that the FoxView workstation he was working on (Blade 
150) locked up and he had to move to Display Manager on the Xterm to correct 
the erroneous value.

   - We have disabled the arrow keys on FoxView while we wait for 9.0.2. Using 
the arrows on some parameters gives very large changes.

   - We need a good way to prevent ridiculous values being entered in 
situations such as this.

 

My question from all this is what have people in this group done to resolve the 
issue of preventing operators from entering dangerous values? One suggestion 
was to have a popup appear if the change is greater than 200kPa (for example). 
Is there an easy way of doing this?

All our workstations are Sun Blade 150's or PC's running Exceed (usually V7). 
I/A is version 7.1.1. FoxView is version 9.0.1

 

Adam Pemberton
Site Electrical & Control Systems Engineer
Lihir Gold Limited

Ph: +675 9865 655
Fax: +675 9865 666
Mob: Nogat
Postal:
   Australia: GPO Box 905, Brisbane, QLD 4001
   PNG: PO Box 789, Port Moresby, NCD

 


 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems 
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. 
Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: