Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- From: dirk.pauwels@xxxxxxxxxx
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:33:02 +0200
The reason why I posted the question " Change CP40 to FCP270" was because
we have Zcp's in our Kallo site and no FCP's so we have no experience with
FCP's, but for a US site we're thinking on upgrading to FCP's rather than
ZCP's, cheaper and easier.
I have to keep the FBM problem mentioned by Tom (FCP with old FBM100's) in
mind. That's good to know.
In our Kallo plant we have a mixture of FBM100 and FBM200. The FBM100's are
connected to the ZCP's by one pair of FCM100E's(PO972ZA) and multiple pairs
of FBI's (P0903ZE):
ZCP --> FCM100E--> FBI
FBI
FBI
...
The FBM200's are connected to the ZCP's by FCM100E's
ZCP--> FCM100E--> FBM200's
FCM100E--> FBM200's
...
We have not experienced any problems with them so far, the FBM200's on one
FCM100 are usually less then 32
But it's good to know what Alex mentioned and I'll keep that in mind for
our future expansions also.
Thanks guys,
Dirk Pauwels - DCS/MOC coordinator
Engineering dept.
Hexion Specialty Chemicals
E mail: dirk.pauwels@xxxxxxxxxx
T. +32.(0)3.570.95.97
F. +32.(0)3.570.16.09
Mob. +32.(0)497.428.300
"Johnson, Alex P
(IPS)"
<alex.johnson@ips To
.invensys.com> <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cc
foxboro-bounce@fr
eelists.org Subject
Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
11/08/2008 01:00
Please respond to
foxboro@freelists
.org
The configuration
ZCP -> FCM -> 30 FBMs
will have poorer (slower) I/O handling than
CP40 -> 30 FBMs
The FCM adds delay. However,
ZCP -> FCM -> 15 FBMs
-> FCM -> 15 FBMs
will out perform the CP40 because the second FCM chain will be working in
parallel and the CP basically won't have to wait for its readings.
ZCP -> FCM -> 10 FBMs
-> FCM -> 10 FBMs
-> FCM -> 10 FBMs
will be even faster.
If the chains aren't balanced, list the short chain first in the ECB
compound. The long chains will run in parallel and generally will complete
by the time they are asked for data or will delay only briefly.
Make sense?
AJ
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of William C Ricker
Sent: Sun 8/10/2008 10:20 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
We have about 30 FBMs, all in a single IE32, all on a single FCM pair.
Yes, and the FCM is first in the _ECB compound, and there are no other
FBMs in that ZCP yet, so all are on the same FCM.
We are hoping/expecting that any future expansion of IO will come with
200 series.
I'd be interested in more info on this.
Thanks
William C Ricker
FeedForward, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Johnson, Alex P (IPS)
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 7:15 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
Chris,
What is the FBM counter per FCM?
The reason that I ask is that a ZCP can be slower than the CP30 for some
applications if the majority of the FBMs are on one FCM and that FCM is
referenced first in the ECB compound.
AJ
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
* Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail and any associated files are intended solely for the individual
or entity to whom they are addressed. Please do not copy it or use it for
any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Further, this
e-mail and any associated files may be confidential and further may be
legally privileged. This email is from the Invensys Process Systems
business unit of Invensys plc which is a company registered in England and
Wales with its registered office at Portland House, Bressenden Place,
London, SW1E 5BF (Registered number 166023). For a list of European legal
entities within the Invensys Process Systems business group, please click
here
http://www.invensys.com/legal/default.asp?top_nav_idw&nav_id€&prev_idw.
If you have received this e-mail in error, you are on notice of its status.
Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message
from your system. Thank you for your co-operation. You may contact our
Helpdesk on +44 (0)20 7821 3859 / 2105 or email
inet.hqhelpdesk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx This e-mail and any attachments thereto may
be subject to the terms of any agreements between Invensys (and/or its
subsidiaries and affiliates) and the recipient (and/or its subsidiaries and
affiliates).
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- From: Johnson, Alex P (IPS)
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- » Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- » Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- » Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- » Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- » Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- » Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- » Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- » Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- » Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- From: Johnson, Alex P (IPS)