Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- From: "Johnson, Alex P (IPS)" <alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:50:21 -0400
The configuration
ZCP -> FCM -> 30 FBMs
will have poorer (slower) I/O handling than
CP40 -> 30 FBMs
The FCM adds delay. However,
ZCP -> FCM -> 15 FBMs
-> FCM -> 15 FBMs
will out perform the CP40 because the second FCM chain will be working in
parallel and the CP basically won't have to wait for its readings.
ZCP -> FCM -> 10 FBMs
-> FCM -> 10 FBMs
-> FCM -> 10 FBMs
will be even faster.
If the chains aren't balanced, list the short chain first in the ECB compound.
The long chains will run in parallel and generally will complete by the time
they are asked for data or will delay only briefly.
Make sense?
AJ
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of William C Ricker
Sent: Sun 8/10/2008 10:20 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
We have about 30 FBMs, all in a single IE32, all on a single FCM pair.
Yes, and the FCM is first in the _ECB compound, and there are no other
FBMs in that ZCP yet, so all are on the same FCM.
We are hoping/expecting that any future expansion of IO will come with
200 series.
I'd be interested in more info on this.
Thanks
William C Ricker
FeedForward, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Johnson, Alex P (IPS)
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 7:15 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
Chris,
What is the FBM counter per FCM?
The reason that I ask is that a ZCP can be slower than the CP30 for some
applications if the majority of the FBMs are on one FCM and that FCM is
referenced first in the ECB compound.
AJ
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
* Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail and any associated files are intended solely for the individual or
entity to whom they are addressed. Please do not copy it or use it for any
purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Further, this e-mail
and any associated files may be confidential and further may be legally
privileged. This email is from the Invensys Process Systems business unit of
Invensys plc which is a company registered in England and Wales with its
registered office at Portland House, Bressenden Place, London, SW1E 5BF
(Registered number 166023). For a list of European legal entities within the
Invensys Process Systems business group, please click here
http://www.invensys.com/legal/default.asp?top_nav_idw&nav_id?&prev_idw.
If you have received this e-mail in error, you are on notice of its status.
Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from
your system. Thank you for your co-operation. You may contact our Helpdesk on
+44 (0)20 7821 3859 / 2105 or email inet.hqhelpdesk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx This e-mail
and any attachments thereto may be subject to the terms of any agreements
between Invensys (and/or its subsidiaries and affiliates) and the recipient
(and/or its subsidiaries and affiliates).
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- From: dirk . pauwels
- Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- From: Marchal, André L.
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- From: William C Ricker
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- » Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- » Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- » Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- » Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- » Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- » Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- » Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- » Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- » Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- From: dirk . pauwels
- Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- From: Marchal, André L.
- Re: [foxboro] Change CP40 to FCP270
- From: William C Ricker