Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- From: "Ronald Stear" <rstear@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:38:27 -0500
Just what make you think I don't have a 'day job'? I'll have you know that
a massive honeydoo list has been trimmed from twelve to three pages in the
almost two years I've been retired. Not only that, but I have to keep my
eye on this list to keep you from going too far astray, do part-time
training for Foxboro, and wonder why nobody's buying my software.
On the subject at hand (browser based HMI), just keep in the forefront your
vivid memories of complaints about 20 to 30 second call-up times in the
early days. Portability such as this often requires many layers of software
at the cost of speed and resources or both. If you can't do it better, then
don't do it.
Hmmm I seem to remember saying the same thing about porting to Windows a few
years back. While all the technical folks are slowly shifting their
opinions away from a UNIX-like environment, I'll just bet you administrator
types are still grinding your teeth at the thought of altogether loosing the
multi user environment.
----- Original Message -----
From: <tom.vandewater@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
> David,
> First I want to thank you for keeping the list informed about the
> User's Conference. That was appreciated by many of us. Secondly, the
> guys
> here at work want me to clarify that I am not really a Kentuckian but a
> Hoosier that works in Kentucky. Actually I was born in Illinois.
> Hoosier
> is really a double contraction for "who is here". When somebody knocks on
> the front door in Indiana we yell "Hoosier" to find out who it is. When I
> get a flat on my car in Kentucky and go to get a new one I need to make
> sure
> to ask for a "tar" because they don't understand if I say tire. Like
> Ales,
> I may be able to consider myself tri-lingual and Kentuckian is my third
> language.
> On a more serious note, if by source forge, you mean trying to
> coordinate development of a browser based HMI that is built via
> collaboration from parties spread across multiple continents, then I think
> it sounds intriguing and, in our cyber world, not impossible. But, I
> think,
> other than Bo, we all still have day jobs so it would be "catch as catch
> can" progress. If we took a stab at it we would 1st have to be visionary
> in
> deciding what pieces of technology are likely to be supported in the long
> run as "open source" solutions. There are many possibilities today and
> some
> have gained worldwide acceptance. Java, JavaScript, PHP, SVG, PNG, MNG,
> Flash, HTML have already been mentioned as building blocks for such an
> endeavor.
> If we didn't do anything more than inspire Foxboro/Wonderware to
> develop an HMI that could be used on Solaris, Linux, Windows, etc.... it
> would be a worthwhile endeavor but it could develop into much more than
> that. At this point the Invensys HMI work is undoubtedly going to be
> designed, in and for, an all Microsoft environment. At least they have
> told
> us their intentions. Thanks for that Alex. If enough users want
> something
> else they will have to look elsewhere or develop it themselves and that is
> where we find ourselves today. We are approaching a cross road and need
> to
> decide which way to turn. There won't be a straight-ahead option.
>
> Cheers,
> Tom VandeWater
> Control Systems Developer/Analyst
> Dow Corning Corporation
> Carrollton, KY USA
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of David Johnson
> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 6:16 PM
> To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
>
>
> Tom,
>
> Even though you are from Kentucky, your English is very good, and mostly
> understandable. Keep working on it, and you will be fluent someday.
>
> Anyone want to try to sourceforge one/all of these HMIs?
>
> David
> (Borned and raised in Alabamer, and shouldn't throw no rocks.)
>
>
> "Quote me as saying I was misquoted."
> Groucho Marx
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- From: tom . vandewater
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- From: tom . vandewater