Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- From: Ales Vaupotic <ales.vaupotic@xxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:23:26 +0200
Greetings, Tom!
tom.vandewater@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Ales, Dirk, and Winston,
> I never cease to be impressed with the technical horsepower
>possessed by the folks on this list!! I know that is just the tip of the
>iceberg because I sit next to a technical superman here at work but
>unfortunately he doesn't "talk too much" like some of us.
>
> Ales, your English is great
>
Thank you, thank you!
>but I had to go look up MinGW,
>(Minimalist Gnu for Windows), to understand what you were struggling with.
>The clue to your struggles was in the letter "W" for Windows. If I was as
>fluent in a "THIRD" language as you are in English there wouldn't be any
>room left in my pea brain for all of this technical stuff.
>
Come on, there is always room for improvement! We all have some hobbies,
it looks like foreign languages are mine.
>You are moving
>toward the OS independent HMI structure that I have been talking about even
>though you are in an all Windows environment. My hat is off to you and
>thank you for your insightful approach.
>
You're welcome!
>Is there any possibility of us
>viewing, (via the web), a non-proprietary example of some of your PNG
>transparent images using Flash as the animator?
>
>
Sure, I'll set up a demo server over the coming weekend and hook it up
to our I/A station at work.
> For those of you like me that didn't know, PNG stands for "Portable
>Network Graphic."
>I found the following info at:
>http://www.sharpened.net/glossary/definition.php?png
> "This format was designed as an alternative to the GIF format (which
>has been plagued by copyright issues). Like GIFs, PNG files are lossless,
>meaning they don't lose any detail when they are compressed. They support up
>to 48-bit color or 16-bit grayscale and typically compress about 5% to 25%
>better than GIF files. However, they do not support animations like GIFs do.
>A format similar to PNG, called MNG, is currently under development, and
>will support animations."
> Is the MNG format being used yet Ales?
>
I don't know if it is being used already, at least I haven't tried it
yet. My output is layered as follows:
1. background - give it a color of your choice
2. transparent PNG with my copy of FoxView screen
3. any flash animations, which replace original animations from FoxView
4. compound:block.point layer
These are all HTML <div>'s with z-index set-up. As with all other
images, browser keeps a cache of the requested data and doesn't transfer
the PNG if not needed. You gain a lot of speed by this behaviour.
>The small size of .PNG files
>appears to be a great selling point.
>
It sure is. I found it also fairly simple to print-screen the existing
views to Photoshop or similar software, choose Color Select and get rid
of background in no time.
>I routinely capture DM graphics using
>Alt/PrtScrn and then paste them into Paint and save them as .GIF files so I
>can email them as a graphical depiction of a process condition. They are
>small in size and of excellent quality.
>
> Dirk, we too use OSI PI for our long term historian. I have looked
>at some of the graphics that our technicians and engineers have built using
>process book but I have mostly just used the trends and Pi Excel to evaluate
>data. Our PI system administrator has mentioned that PI has browser based
>capability but until you mentioned it I hadn't considered it as a potential
>HMI platform. PI does a good job of integrating process data from a lot of
>different sources and our corporate structure allows us to integrate data
>from all of our manufacturing sites globally so it does have appeal. I will
>find out if their solution is MS browser specific or not. My bet is yes.
>
> Winston, I couldn't believe you were able to resist the temptation
>for as long as you did. You must be really busy! You are another one of
>the quiet technical supermen I talked about above. Even though Mozilla has
>gotten kicked around a bit I see that there are a lot of folks interested
>and enthused about it's potential to usurp the mighty empire of Mr. Bill.
>SVG, (Scaled Vector Graphics) and PHP, (Hypertext Preprocessor), are also
>here to stay and provide additional tools that can be used by creative
>geniuses to deliver the Utopia like HMI! (PHP) is a server-side,
>cross-platform, HTML-embedded scripting language used to create dynamic web
>pages. PHP is Open Source software.
> Is there a new CAPE product on the horizon that uses an HMI like the one
>you talk about? Let us all know!
>
> The one thing that I realized from all of this is that there must
>really be a need for a flexible, OS independent, HMI in the process
>industries. Many folks are spending significant time and effort trying to
>come up with a solution, and progress is being made! This does create a
>serious problem for DCS vendors because the HMI market is a significant cash
>cow for them and I believe that the market is going to develop into a very
>competitive "commodity" business much sooner than we can imagine. If DCS
>data can be served in a timely manner and integrated with many other data
>sources available on a network in a generic browser, companies such as
>Wonderware and Foxboro will be challenged to their very core to provide
>value that customers are willing to pay for. Foxboro does have more than an
>HMI and I haven't heard anyone saying that they aren't providing good
>controller and I/O options, and that is where, most would say, their
>strength lies.
> My 5 year prediction is that DCS vendor HMI's will be much cheaper
>and provide more functionality or DCS vendors will no longer be in the HMI
>market! That's my story and I'm sticking to it. Heck, everybody will
>forget I ever said it in 5 years anyway.
>
>
>
I couldn't agree with you more.
>Tom VandeWater
>Control Systems Developer/Analyst
>Dow Corning Corporation
>Carrollton, KY USA
>
>
>
>
BR,
Ales.
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- From: tom . vandewater
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- » Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- Re: [foxboro] Browser Based HMI
- From: tom . vandewater