Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
- From: Corey R Clingo <clingoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:08:00 -0500
From what I got at the Showcase, current WP/AW hardware will not be
software-upgradeable to I/A version 7. Their plan is for you to run a
dual-version system, i.e., v7 on the new stuff, v6.4 (or earlier -- how
much earlier you can get away with I don't know) on the old. Supposedly
the primary difference between v7 and v6.4 is the Solaris version, but
this could get more, um, interesting with software versions beyond v7.
Corey
|---------+---------------------------->
| | Priya Babu |
| | <srisiva@emirates|
| | .net.ae> |
| | Sent by: |
| | foxboro-bounce@fr|
| | eelists.org |
| | |
| | |
| | 09/23/2002 10:39 |
| | AM |
| | Please respond to|
| | foxboro |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: foxboro
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
|
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
We have a similar situation. The local Foxboro rep said we need to upgrade
entire system to a new version (7?) to have a Solaris 8 based station. We
run on version 6.1. If someone gets more information, please share with us
here.
Regards,
Sivanath Babu
Abu Dhabi Oil Refining Co.
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
- From: David Johnson
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
- » Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
- » Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
- » Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
- » Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
- » Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
- » Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
- » Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
- » Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
- » Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
- » Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
- » Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
- » Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
- » Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
- » Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
- » Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
- » Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
- Re: [foxboro] ArchestrA related question
- From: David Johnson