Re: [foxboro] A mesh question
- From: stan <stanb@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Johnson, Alex P (IPS)" <alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 23:40:24 -0500
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 06:39:59PM -0500, Johnson, Alex P (IPS) wrote:
> The ZCP270 support the use of FCMs on the Mesh network.
>
> The Mesh network's redundancy depends on multiple connections between
> switches.
>
> In your case something like this might make sense:
>
>
> C ---> Switch ---------- ... ------------ -> Switch -------> A
> P | | | W
> 2 | | | 7
> 7-------> Switch ---------- ... -------------> Switch -------> 0
> 0 | |
> | |
> FCM -----> FBMs
>
> You could go diagonally between the switches in the buildings, but that is
> too hard to draw.
That's really the key answer, and it's the one I wanted to hear.
Actually given teh exisiting fiber runs, we could have 4 pairs between the
switches in the 2
buildings, some crossed, adn some not.
>
> Does this help?
Indeed ti does.
--
U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite Vietcong
Terror
- New York Times 9/3/1967
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] A mesh question
- From: Johnson, Alex P (IPS)
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] A mesh question
- » Re: [foxboro] A mesh question
- » Re: [foxboro] A mesh question
- » Re: [foxboro] A mesh question
- » Re: [foxboro] A mesh question
- » Re: [foxboro] A mesh question
- » Re: [foxboro] A mesh question
- » Re: [foxboro] A mesh question
- Re: [foxboro] A mesh question
- From: Johnson, Alex P (IPS)