Re: [foxboro] 100 Series FBM Reliability Data
- From: "Larsen, Ed" <ed.larsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:35:55 -0400
Dirk,
There has been an issue with FBM100 series going offline and back online
seemingly at will. Make sure your letterbugs are fully seated. They have
been known to work loose in the nosecone. =
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of dirk.pauwels@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 2:44 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] 100 Series FBM Reliability Data
We have a fair number of FBM100's, from '95. Can't say we experienced
any
reliability problems over the past 12 years. Some minor channel
problems,
probably due to incorrect connections. We do have some cards going
offline
occasionally, but after replacement of the cards the problem remained,
so
the problem probably resides in the mounting structures....We also have
a
large amount of FBM 100 spares, so we're not thinking of replacing our
old
FBM100's, there's no way I can justify to management why we should be
replacing them....
We also have the new FBM200's, I like them better, because they're
cheaper,
consume less space and allow for very clean and neat wiring in our new
cabinets. Replacing the old ones however would mean downtime, and a
considerable investment, which at this time cannot be justified.
Rgds,
Dirk Pauwels - DCS/MOC coordinator
Engineering dept.
Hexion Specialty Chemicals
E mail: dirk.pauwels@xxxxxxxxxx
T. +32.(0)3.570.95.97
F. +32.(0)3.570.16.09
Mob. +32.(0)497.428.300
=
<dave.caldwell@do
wcorning.com>
Sent by:
To =
foxboro-bounce@fr <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
eelists.org
cc =
=
=
Subject =
18-10-2007 23:31 [foxboro] 100 Series FBM
Reliability Data
=
Please respond to
foxboro@freelists
.org
=
=
All Knowing List,
I need help in justifying to management why we should be replacing the
1989 vintage 100 series FBMs in our plant with brand new 200 series. The
question is being asked how much longer can we continue to run before
these FBMs start to fail (never mind that they aren't being made
anymore).
We have collected failure data from our own plant that suggests that at
least some of the FBMs are showing signs of aging. I base this on a
marked increase in EEPROM upgrades for the very oldest FBM04s in recent
years.
I've looked at the data Foxboro provides for 100 series reliability in
the past, and don't think their numbers show any big failure increase.
(In fact, I think some of the FBMs actually improved with age!) Of
course, this data is most likely based on returned FBMs and some folks
may just be putting their old ones in a dumpster.
Anyway, my questions for the list are:
* Does anyone have any failure data on very early 100 series FBMs?
* Are there signs that these are reaching end-of-life?
* Is there a reliability justification for replacing these older
modules?
Your thoughts are appreciated.
Dave
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=
=
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=
Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail and any associated files are intended solely for the individual=
or entity to whom they are addressed. Please do not copy it or use it for =
any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Further, this e=
-mail and any associated files may be confidential and further may be legal=
ly privileged. This email is from the Invensys Process Systems business uni=
t of Invensys plc which is a company registered in England and Wales with i=
ts registered office at Portland House, Bressenden Place, London, SW1E 5BF =
(Registered number 166023). For a list of European legal entities within t=
he Invensys Process Systems business group, please click here http://www.in=
vensys.com/legal/default.asp?top_nav_id=3D77&nav_id=3D80&prev_id=3D77.
If you have received this e-mail in error, you are on notice of its status.=
Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message =
from your system. Thank you for your co-operation. You may contact our Help=
desk on +44 (0)20 7821 3859 / 2105 or email inet.hqhelpdesk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx T=
his e-mail and any attachments thereto may be subject to the terms of any a=
greements between Invensys (and/or its subsidiaries and affiliates) and the=
recipient (and/or its subsidiaries and affiliates).
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
