PCS repairs a fair number of the 100 series. The failures we've seen are in one or more of three catagories: 1. Blown fuse (for whatever reason) 2. Blown channel (usually one where someone hooked it to 220) 3. Blown fieldbus chips (usually from an ESD) We never see bad A/D, channels out of spec or failed processors. Of course, we see only the FBMs that people want fixed. We don't see the ones that end up in the trash. -----Original Message----- From: dave.caldwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dave.caldwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thu 10/18/2007 5:30 PM To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Subject: [foxboro] 100 Series FBM Reliability Data All Knowing List, I need help in justifying to management why we should be replacing the 1989 vintage 100 series FBMs in our plant with brand new 200 series. The question is being asked how much longer can we continue to run before these FBMs start to fail (never mind that they aren't being made anymore). We have collected failure data from our own plant that suggests that at least some of the FBMs are showing signs of aging. I base this on a marked increase in EEPROM upgrades for the very oldest FBM04s in recent years. I've looked at the data Foxboro provides for 100 series reliability in the past, and don't think their numbers show any big failure increase. (In fact, I think some of the FBMs actually improved with age!) Of course, this data is most likely based on returned FBMs and some folks may just be putting their old ones in a dumpster. Anyway, my questions for the list are: * Does anyone have any failure data on very early 100 series FBMs? * Are there signs that these are reaching end-of-life? * Is there a reliability justification for replacing these older modules? Your thoughts are appreciated. Dave _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave -------------------------------------------------------- This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is CONFIDENTIAL, subject to copyright or constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or distribution of this message, or files associated with this message, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Messages sent to and from Process Control Services, Inc. may be monitored. Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, we do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions that are present in this message, or any attachment, that have arisen as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard-copy version. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. -- No attachments (even text) are allowed -- -- Type: application/ms-tnef -- File: winmail.dat _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave