[foxboro] Version 8 redundant FBM letterbugs
- From: "Kinsinger, Matthew R" <mkinsinger@xxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:56:32 -0400
I went to a Foxboro training course at the beginning of August for =
version 8. I was told for redundant FBM pairs, the letterbug must be =
named with the last letter A, B, C, D, corresponding to the pairs of =
slots on the board. We are programming an expansion, and our tech was =
just in and this hit me right before the sys def and he said that it =
wasn't true. Can someone help me confirm if say a pair of FBM233's would =
need to be named xxxxxA for both?=20
Thanks,
Matt Kinsinger x1208
Process Control Engineer
PPG Barberton
330-825-1208
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
- » [foxboro] Version 8 redundant FBM letterbugs
