[foxboro] UNACK bit of a BLNALM block
- From: Johan.Van.Elsen@xxxxxxxxxx
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 13:31:42 +0100
Hi All,
We are using several BLNALM block's for generating ALARMS (alarm bits that
are comming from a Gateway) and my question is:
How can I see wich alarm of the BLNALM block is already Acknoweledged and
wich alarm not ?
The Block description mention only one UNACK bit for all 8 alarms
When I acknowledge One alarm for instance via the Alarm manager all other
alarms are also acknowledged !
How can I solve this problem ? I don't want to create for every alarm a
different block !
Thanks.
Johan Van Elsen
INDAVER
Systeembeheerder
E-mail: Johan.van.elsen@xxxxxxxxxx
Tel : + 32 (0)3 / 568-48-65
Fax: + 32 (0)3 / 568-49-99
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
- » [foxboro] UNACK bit of a BLNALM block