[foxboro] [SPAM] - Re: Question on IACC database limit - Email found in subject
- From: <Adam.Pemberton@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:29:15 +1000
Thanks Alex. Your response enlightens me greatly, including to another
possible piece of confusion I've got from this course.
We have been told that you cannot import a SysDef committal into an
existing IACC database. It can only be imported into a new database. If
this was the case, then using SysDef would not be practical since one
would have to edit SysDef and all IACC databases by hand whenever the
System Definition changes (which seems to be every month here at LGL at
the moment).
Can you please clarify?
Regards
Adam
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Johnson, Alex P (IPS)
Sent: Thursday, 25 October 2007 11:36 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SPAM] - Re: [foxboro] Question on IACC database limit - Email
found in subject
Here's my advice:
1) Use SysDef not IACC for system definitions
2) Use an IACC server per plant area
-------------------
<Rest of the thread removed>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
- » [foxboro] [SPAM] - Re: Question on IACC database limit - Email found in subject
