[foxboro] R: DNBI Cabling for long Distance
- From: "Crivellotto, Davide" <Davide.Crivellotto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:27:26 -0400
Another solution is to use DNBX instead of DNBI, BUT I was told about
Nodebus problems with this configuration.
I think NCNI and a remote 1x8 will be good.
Davide
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Per conto di Corey R Clingo
Inviato: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 4:07 PM
A: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Oggetto: Re: [foxboro] DNBI Cabling for long Distance
I'd be careful with that. The additional latency of the converters may=20
exceed the maximum allowed propagation time on the nodebus segment,=20
causing problems with the Ethernet collision detection,
When we have had to do this, we dropped in a remote 1x8 and used FONBEs
(in the old days). or NCNIs (now). If you just need to connect two or=20
three segments you can connect the NCNIs back-to-back without a switch.
Corey Clingo
BASF Corporation
"Khudhair, Waleed K" <waleed.khudhair@xxxxxxxxxx>=20
Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
07/25/2006 06:01 AM
Please respond to
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
[foxboro] DNBI Cabling for long Distance
Guys,
As per the I/A Doc's, the DNBI can be cabled in either of two
configurations:
* Local - where the DNBI and the processor share the same
enclosure
* Medium-Distance - where the DNBI and the processor are separated
by a distance of greater than 2 m (6 ft) up to 45m (150 ft).
What about if the DNBI and the processor are separated by a distance of
greater than 45m, can we use a media converter at both ends and use
fiber optic cables in between?
Regards,
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
Waleed K. Al-Khudhair
Uthmaniyah Gas Plant
Engineering Building
Room 130
DCS Administrator
Tele +9663577-5396
Pager +9663870-1474
eFax +96638744444 / Ext. 133732
=20
=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=20
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe: =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] R: DNBI Cabling for long Distance
- From: Corey R Clingo
Other related posts:
- » [foxboro] R: DNBI Cabling for long Distance
- Re: [foxboro] R: DNBI Cabling for long Distance
- From: Corey R Clingo