[foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?

OK, I might be turning into an HLBL crackhead :)

I rolled my own rolling average program in an IND block the other day, and 
it's sooo much nicer for long average periods or fast scan times than 47 
CALCA blocks.  Maybe 20 actual lines of code (plus comments), and it 
executed fully in a BPC with no noticeable loading on a CP40B.  So 
naturally I get to thinking where else I could use this shiny new power 
tool...


I did it as an IND block, which was OK for my one application, but got to 
wondering if I should implement it also as a MON/DEP combination or 
something similar, so as not to hog up that compound's IND block slot 
(which might be doing something important, like sending out mass emails 
urging people to write in David Johnson for prez) with some chicken-poo 
little rolling average program.  I guess I could locate it in another 
compound, but that seems ugly.   As I was reading through the HLBL docs, 
though, I never saw any mention of the 1-IND-per-compound restriction I've 
heard for all these years, and so I wonder if that limit is still real?


Corey Clingo
BASF Corporation




 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

Other related posts: