[foxboro] One CSA? (was: Conectivity between nodes)
- From: Corey R Clingo <clingoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:43:13 -0500
> The theory behind CSA is that it is needed only for=20
> configuration and that
> maintenance can be scheduled around that activity. Taking it down is
> supposed to have no impact on operations.
Doesn't Select/FoxSelect use CSA?
And, if CSA is only needed for configuration, why have CSA at all? Just
build that lookup functionality into ICC.
Corey Clingo
BASF Corp.
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- From: Weiss, Andreas
Other related posts:
- » [foxboro] One CSA? (was: Conectivity between nodes)
- Re: [foxboro] Conectivity between nodes
- From: Weiss, Andreas