[foxboro] OPC again...
- From: "Joseph M. Riccardi" <Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:43:40 -0400
Folks,
I have always wondered if OPC was not just intended to collect data, or is
it also considered a viable communication link for control? I now have a
vendor that wants to perform advanced process control from their PC-based
software to specific control loops on the Foxboro System via OPC? Read
measurement values, execute advanced control algorithms, write control
outputs, etc.
Is OPC considered secure, reliable, repeatable, etc. enough for control?
Your thoughts/recommendations?
Joseph M. Riccardi, Inc.
DCS Services - Industrial Process Control
North-Central Office (OH, PA, MI, IN, WV Area)
South-East Office (FL, GA, AL, SC, NC Area)
Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
"To give real service you must add something that cannot be bought or
measured with money; and that is sincerity and integrity." - Donald A. Adams
-- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
-- Type: application/ms-tnef
-- File: winmail.dat
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] OPC again...
- From: Johnson, Alex P \(IPS\)
- Re: [foxboro] OPC again...
- From: Corey R Clingo
Other related posts:
- » [foxboro] OPC again...
- Re: [foxboro] OPC again...
- From: Johnson, Alex P \(IPS\)
- Re: [foxboro] OPC again...
- From: Corey R Clingo