[foxboro] More Process Summary Reporter Quirks
- From: "Loudermilk, Virgil:" <Virgil.Loudermilk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:04:47 -0400
We noticed yet another quirk today in the PSR in that the documentation
(the latest I can find is B0193DG REV. E, fated June 30, 1999!) mentions
nothing about "Alarms Disabled ", which show up on our PSR screen right
under "Alarms Inhibited", but not on the screen print in the
documentation. And reports using just the "Alarms Inhibited" choice do
not pick up all of the inhibited CIN blocks, but they apparently pick up
some newly built ones - very odd. But also selecting "Alarms Disabled"
does cause it to pick up all inhibited CIN blocks. As far as I know,
Foxboro only uses the term Inhibited alarm, not disabled alarm. Does
anyone know what is going on here?
Thanks,
Virgil
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] More Process Summary Reporter Quirks
- From: Corey R Clingo
- Re: [foxboro] More Process Summary Reporter Quirks
- From: Johnson, Alex P (IPS)
Other related posts:
- » [foxboro] More Process Summary Reporter Quirks
- Re: [foxboro] More Process Summary Reporter Quirks
- From: Corey R Clingo
- Re: [foxboro] More Process Summary Reporter Quirks
- From: Johnson, Alex P (IPS)