[foxboro] Judicious Quoting (was Re: foxboro Digest V5 #284)
- From: Duc M Do <duc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 18:07:25 -0400
At 04:47 PM 8/23/05 -0400, Rguercio@xxxxxxx wrote:
>I wonder if I could make a small request. I faithfully read through the
>freelist several times a week as it is issued. I find myself having
>to scroll
>through a lot of repeat stuff. Is it possible to avoid some of this by
>highlighting a small portion (such as I have done above) of what you
>are actually
>responding to and then hitting reply? I am using AOL, so maybe that
>is only a
>feature of AOL, but it sure would shorten the amount of useless text we all
>have to scroll through to find the new and original mailings. It would also
>cut the size of my archives considerably, which can never hurt.
>
>While I am at it, several of you issue lengthy corporate policies with each
>communique (especially it seems the latino entries) that I don't need
>to read
>every time. Would it be possible to cut out the standard blah-blah-blah and
>only include a one-liner warning that there is a corporate policy associated
>with your e-mail, and where to find and read that policy if we care to?
>
>I think these two modified practices would really streamline the freelist
>and save time for many professionals each day. Thanks to all,
Judiciously quoting the relevant part of the e-mail is only good e-mail
etiquette, and it's easy to do if you use a "nice" e-mail client such
as I do here. However, at work, I'm saddled with the POS that is
Outlook, which encourages people to add their part to the top of the
e-mail in a (reverse) string-of-conversation format. Not that one
shouldn't try to delete the multiple footers even when sending the
posting in this fashion.
The legal mumbo-jumbo at the bottom, however redundant, may be added
automatically by the corporate mail server over which the individual
poster may not have any control.
I will add an additional request: please post in *plain* text. You can
see what a mess a posting in HTML can be.
Duc
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] foxboro Digest V5 #284
- From: Rguercio
Other related posts:
- » [foxboro] Judicious Quoting (was Re: foxboro Digest V5 #284)
- Re: [foxboro] foxboro Digest V5 #284
- From: Rguercio