[foxboro] ICC field width (was Re: stddisp)
- From: Sascha Wildner <swildner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:10:49 +0200
foxpat wrote:
>
> Reproduced mentioned problem at our site as well (created a query to give me
> all PAKIN blocks where Compound + Block length exceeded 22 characters. Found
> about 10 instances, all showing described problem!)
>
> I submitted a CAR today.
>
> Thanks again for pointing it out!
Speaking of maximum lengths (your mail just reminded me of it), the ICC
will not allow to enter a link that has the maximum number of characters
(which is 42) because the field is only 41 characters wide.
I submitted a CAR about it back in noughty nought, but they didn't even
get my point and it was closed without further action.
Regards,
--
Sascha Wildner
erpicon Software Development GmbH
Neusser Str. 724-726
50737 Köln
Germany
Phone: +49 221 9746089
Fax: +49 221 9746099
Mobile: +49 174 9887655
eMail: swildner@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] ICC field width (was Re: stddisp)
- From: Corey R Clingo
- References:
- [foxboro] stddisp
- From: Rguercio
- Re: [foxboro] stddisp
- From: foxpat
- Re: [foxboro] stddisp
- From: foxpat
Other related posts:
- » [foxboro] ICC field width (was Re: stddisp)
- Re: [foxboro] ICC field width (was Re: stddisp)
- From: Corey R Clingo
- [foxboro] stddisp
- From: Rguercio
- Re: [foxboro] stddisp
- From: foxpat
- Re: [foxboro] stddisp
- From: foxpat