[foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- From: Jeff Hurt <thehurtman@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
We are in the design phase for a new Foxboro I/A project. For our compounds,
we were considering having one compound for each type of block (AIN, COUT,
etc). It seems that this is a break from the norm, grouping by system. Any
thoughts as to why grouping by block type would be a bad idea?
Thanks,
Jeff
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- From: Gregory A Hurwitt
- Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- From: Sascha Wildner
- Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- From: Joseph M. Riccardi
- Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- From: Corey R Clingo
- Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- From: Neil Martin
- Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- From: Moore, Kenneth, Celanese/US
- Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- From: Mike
Other related posts:
- » [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- From: Gregory A Hurwitt
- Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- From: Sascha Wildner
- Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- From: Joseph M. Riccardi
- Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- From: Corey R Clingo
- Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- From: Neil Martin
- Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- From: Moore, Kenneth, Celanese/US
- Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- From: Mike