[foxboro] GDEV functionality - was Foxboro's programming

OK, I've never had the security coding kick in before ... here's try #2.

Replying to Joseph Wu's note that GDEV provides independent outputs ... the
2 GDEV outputs, COUT_1 & COUT_2, are NOT independent.

There are (potentially) 4 output states for a GDEV ... both COUTs on, both
COUTs off, or each COUT on while the other is off.  However, the GDEV only
allows for 2 desired states ... MANDSR/AUTDSR = 0 or 1.

With PLSOPT = 0, the 2 outputs are always opposite to each other (unless
INVCO is set).
With PLSOPT = 1, the 2 outputs are momentarily the same during stroking,
but it's not a permanent state.

Because INVCO1 & INVCO2 are non-connectable & non-settable, they cannot be
used to modify either scheme.

Has Foxboro ever considered making COUT_1 & COUT_2 truly independent, so
the GDEV could have 4 output states ?

Brad Wilson
Process Control Engineer
ExxonMobil Chemical Co
Edison Synthetics Plant
732-321-6115
732-321-6177 fax
Brad.S.Wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

Other related posts: