[foxboro] FBM231 for Non-Redundant Modbus
- From: "Dimitris Legakis" <legourasj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:59:29 +0000
Hello all,
Does anyone know whether i can use a single FBM231 at the place of an FBM230
for non-redundant modbus communication?
According to the manual when you are using a pair of FBM231 you insert one
ECB202 for both. When using an FBM230 you insert one ECB200 for each FBM.
Could FBM231 work with ECB200? has anyone tried this before?
regards,
Dimitris
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] FBM231 for Non-Redundant Modbus
- From: The Automation Man
- Re: [foxboro] FBM231 for Non-Redundant Modbus
- From: Bounds, Glen
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] ICCDRVR.tsk - GET script problem
- From: Ron Schafer
Other related posts:
- » [foxboro] FBM231 for Non-Redundant Modbus
- Re: [foxboro] FBM231 for Non-Redundant Modbus
- From: The Automation Man
- Re: [foxboro] FBM231 for Non-Redundant Modbus
- From: Bounds, Glen
- Re: [foxboro] ICCDRVR.tsk - GET script problem
- From: Ron Schafer