[foxboro] Bad I/O vs. high/low alarming
- From: Corey R Clingo <corey.clingo@xxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:16:59 -0400
Hi list,
We are undertaking an "alarm management" (well, at this stage, alarm
elimination) project in one of my plants. The question of why we need bad
I/O (BAO) alarming when we have high and low alarms on an AIN block was
raised. Most of our bad I/O alarms are due to sensor/transmitter
failures, which typically either open the loop or drive the signal high,
so it is a valid question.
So I was trying to think of a situation where one might get a bad I/O
alarm but not a high or low when both high and low are enabled. We set
LASTGV = 0 as a rule (why it defaults to 1 is beyond me), and card
failures would show up in system management. Any other scenarios I might
have overlooked? What is the general feeling on this topic?
Thanks,
Corey Clingo
BASF Corporation
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] Bad I/O vs. high/low alarming
- From: Ali Ahmed Zahidi
Other related posts:
- » [foxboro] Bad I/O vs. high/low alarming
- Re: [foxboro] Bad I/O vs. high/low alarming
- From: Ali Ahmed Zahidi