[foxboro] Alarm Printer P80BWS fed from P92 Delay
- From: "Landry, Dwayne" <rdlandry@xxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:13:36 -0500
We were told that the days of the Com Processor are long gone and the =
new way is to use the Com port on a P92. We have an upgrade going on and =
are using the Visual Alert package to display the alarms to the =
operators. There is about an 8 to 10 second delay from the time you get =
the audible alarm until time it shows up on the com port. Has anyone =
else experienced this feature and have you found a way to reduce this =
delay?=20
This is not a major problem but it would be nice if this configuration =
worked as well as it used to.
Thanks,
Dwayne Landry
PPG Industries Inc.
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
- » [foxboro] Alarm Printer P80BWS fed from P92 Delay