[foxboro] AW: AW: format in Alarm Manager

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]Im Auftrag von Johnson, Alex
> (Foxboro)
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. Februar 2003 20:34
> An: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: Re: [foxboro] AW: format in Alarm Manager
>
> The reason for this is that they are not alarms. Notice that the
> .UNACK parameter of the Sequence Block is not set when these
> messages are issued.
>
> In fact, if you examine the message displayed on the screen it
> is an "INFO" message not an alarm.

While this is satisfying as an answer, as a concept it is not.  Why do
these messages go to the AM (which should only show alarms) at all if they
are no alarms?  On the other hand, if they have to go to the AM then why
not make them "operable" (e.g. some sort of quittable) by the AM?  In real
life you always need assistance from someone with the appropriate
privileges to make them go away since you don't want to allow the operators
to clear alarms.

Regards,
Sascha

 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

Other related posts: