[foxboro] 200 series redundant FBMs - Myth Busters
- From: "Hicks, Gaylon F." <gfhicks@xxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:24:52 -0500
I have a question on the newest/latest/greatest 200 series baseplates
and redundant FBMs for all the I/A gurus out there. Our configuration
will have an 8 slot horizontal baseplate with two FBM246s in slots 1 and
2, with a redundancy adapter. This baseplate will be mounted on the
Foxboro 19" rack mount adapter plate, which is offset into the panel and
leaves basically zero clearance on the left (and right) side of the
baseplate. Will this physically work? Reliable word of mouth has it
that the earlier generation baseplates and/or redundancy adapters and/or
cable assemblies had an interference if installed in slots 1/2 or 7/8 in
this configuration. Is this a fact or just another I/A Myth on the
latest hardware? Any input or (relevant) comments will be appreciated.
Thanks,
=================================================
Gaylon F. Hicks
Tennessee Valley Authority, Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant
Mail Stop SAB-1B
PO Box 2000
Decatur, AL 35609
Phone:(256) 729-7804 Fax:(256) 729-2047
email gfhicks@xxxxxxx
FedEx Address: Shaw Road, Athens, AL 35611
==================================================
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
- » [foxboro] 200 series redundant FBMs - Myth Busters