[ExchangeList] Re: exchange 2007 sp1
- From: "Carl Houseman" <c.houseman@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:30:51 -0400
Thanks again. I've been waiting for Longhorn to start trying out E2K7 and I
guess I can wait a bit longer...
_____
From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 11:18 AM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] Re: exchange 2007 sp1
Last time I checked, some roles work, other roles don't. Without checking, I
don't think it's a supported install.
For stability, I think that Win2003sp2 + E2K7 + sp1 beta is VERY stable.
I could say lots of things about software development cycles, but the
important thing you should try to realize is that the b3 fork for longhorn
happened at an inauspicious time insofar as Exchange 2007 is concerned. The
Exchange team has access to much later builds than b3.
From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carl Houseman
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 10:43 AM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] Re: exchange 2007 sp1
Thanks for your opinions - always worthwhile reading.
Any views on the relative stability of Longhorn (W2K8) beta 3 + E2K7 + SP1
beta?
_____
From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 8:36 AM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] Re: exchange 2007 sp1
"am prohibited from saying what I have been told".
It's public knowledge that the "beta" of sp1 is "probably not" feature
complete insofar as the final sp1 is concerned.
One could perhaps surmise that it was released when it was released in order
to correct some of the glaring deficiencies that prevent Exchange 2007 at
RTM from having feature parity in some specific areas with Exchange 2003
sp2. Microsoft might even suspect that, given how relatively few charges
there were (in comparison to a normal full service pack) that a number of
companies would be willing to install that beta into production in order to
attain that feature parity - should those features be important to them.
From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carl Houseman
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 2:05 PM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] Re: exchange 2007 sp1
Sayeth not - is that "refuses to say" or "says it is not" ?
From the web:
"A deponent is a witness who gives information about the crime under oath in
a deposition."
Promising features and reneging - sounds like a crime to me!
_____
From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 10:18 AM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] Re: exchange 2007 sp1
I can confirm that it isn't there.
Insofar as 'softies plans - this deponent sayeth not.
From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tom Kern
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 5:46 PM
To: ExchangeList
Subject: [ExchangeList] exchange 2007 sp1
so, while reading the pre relase notes, i see that sp1 beta does NOT have
SCR included in it
can anyone confirm this and if so, does anyone know if it will still be due
with the RTM sp1?
thanks
Other related posts:
