RE: clustered exchange environment
- From: "A. M. Salim" <msalim@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:29:04 -0400 (EDT)
clarification ... the intent being that the second server will be a backup
server to the first one and stay "in sync" somehow, so if the primary
dies, the secondary can take over. Not clustering for load sharing.
best regards
Mike
> > Not possible
> > Is it feasible to implement a clustered Exchange 2003 server environment
> > with two Windows 2003 Enterprise servers, each server having internal IDE
> > (ATA) drives not SCSI, and no "shared storage array" device? i.e., the
> > two servers would keep in sync over a private ethernet link, including
> > Exchange 2003 Enterprise.
>
> So clustering is only possible without a shared SCSI device? So how do
> you cluster two Exchange servers across the internet, say in different
> data centers many miles apart?
>
> best regards
> Mike
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
> Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
> Exchange FAQ: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
> World of Windows Networking: http://www.windowsnetworking.com
> Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com
> No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org
> Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/
> Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/
> Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
> ------------------------------------------------------
> You are currently subscribed to this MSEXchange.org Discussion List as:
> msalim@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe visit http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
> Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Other related posts:
