Re: Why 4 Procs

  • From: Danny <nocmonkey@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:24:52 -0500

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:45:45 -0800 (PST), C Drawers <cdrawers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 4 Processor servers seem to always been chosen for mailbox servers.  Since a
> comparable equipped 2 processor server is often 1/4 the cost and it seems
> the latest 2 proc box has equivilant ghz power as a 4 proc box, it sure
> seems like 2 proc boxes are the way to go. 

[...] 

Not sure if this is of any help: 

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;827281

> Any crazy theories or even better... concrete theories with data to suppor
> the theory? 

Here's one: if you can afford it, the more the better! :D

...D


Other related posts: