[ExchangeList] Re: SAN
- From: Evan Mann <emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:39:04 -0500
http://www.msexchange.org
-------------------------------------------------------Not much to it in the
most basic theoretical sense Carve out some LUN's
from your SAN, move the stores to 1 LUN and the transaction logs to
another in ESM and you are done. Of course, you have to think about how
you connect to the SAN and various other factors. Then there's the
price.
My server is connected via 2gig Fiber to Brocade switches with
multipathing, then into a redudant heads on a NetApp. No complaints
here.
Beyond that, various SAN vendors offer different type of software to do
advanced functionality with snapshotting, mirroring, etc.
________________________________
From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Knijn
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 7:14 AM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] SAN
Hi,
Does anybody has (bad?) experiences with Exchange Server 2003 Enterprise
Edition and the use of SAN (Storage Attached Network)?
Thanks.
John
-------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: //www.freelists.org/archives/exchangelist/
MSExchange Newsletter: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
MSExchange Articles and Tutorials: http://www.msexchange.org/articles_tutorials/
MSExchange Blogs: http://blogs.msexchange.org/
-------------------------------------------------------
Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
http://www.techgenix.com
-------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe visit http://www.msexchange.org/pages/exchangelist.asp
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
