[ExchangeList] Re: Restoring mailboxes in Exchange 2000/2003

  • From: "Periyasamy, Raj" <Raj.Periyasamy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:44:40 -0400

I don't think the Ed Crowley Never Restore method is really useful in
practical world. because, 90% of all restore requests are shift deletes.
Shift delete does not send the deleted item to dumpster. Its gone for
good immediately.
 

HTH. 
Regards, 
Raj Periyasamy 
MCSE(Messaging), CCNA 


________________________________

From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rick Boza
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 9:31 AM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] Re: Restoring mailboxes in Exchange 2000/2003



I'm not clear on exactly what you are asking - is the question whether
or not his is viable? Absolutely.  Is it optimal?  No, that's why
Microsoft introduced the recovery storage group.  

 

But a better solution is the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method (tm)
While it was originally designed around Exchange 5.5, the principles
remain valid through E2K7.


Rick

 

From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of MAHADEVAN
Subramanyan
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 3:31 AM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] Restoring mailboxes in Exchange 2000/2003

 

Sorry Guys...Am posting this question again...

 

While surfing the net i got this info from one of the Microsoft site
which states that the exchange database can be restored in the different
exchange server with same Org name and Structure in different forest.
Here is the site

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/823176 (have a glimpse at Method 3)

 

Is it possible to restore an Exchange database from a backup in a
different Exchange recovery server (with same organization name,
administrative group & Storage group name) in a different Forest? 

 

Plz give your suggestions... and also let me know if any one of you have
tried this and got succeeded....

 

 

Regards, Maha

MCSE: Messaging

 

Confidentiality Statement:

This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it
is addressed. It may contain privileged, confidential information which
is exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, please note that you are strictly prohibited from
disseminating or distributing this information (other than to the
intended recipient) or copying this information. If you have received
this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return
email.

Confidentiality Statement:

This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it
is addressed. It may contain privileged, confidential information which
is exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, please note that you are strictly prohibited from
disseminating or distributing this information (other than to the
intended recipient) or copying this information. If you have received
this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return
email.

Other related posts: