Responding to 2 different posts by the same person: > John, see my post re eScan & MailScan - they do! Try it for yourself > www.mwti.net . What can I say, I have not seen any infection on any of > my clients since we started using eScan over 2 years back. I am now > beginng to miss my virus cleanups :( > "But, we are proud to share with you the fact that users of the recently > released MailScan 4.2 and eScan 2003 'e' edition, will all be protected > against such scums. This is primarily because both these products > email-scanning engine has a feature to look inside a ZIP file > (irrespective of whether it is password-protected or not) and then > removing this ZIP file itself if it is found to be having a dangerous > attachment. So, if you wondered how come you never received such worm > infected mails, you now know the reason for the same :-)" My statement stands. They admit (without saying it) that even they can not catch a virus such as Bagle.J inside of an encrypted zip file. All they are doing is banning the fact that there is an executable file within the zip. The software I use does that as well very nicely. To reiterate, there is yet no Anti-Virus scanning engine that can find and identify a virus such as Bagle.J inside of an encrypted zip file. BTW, striping an e-mail of an "harmful" attachment and then sending is not the recommended course of action. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You