RE: Reasons not to run normal AV on E2K server???? ?
- From: "Mulnick, Al" <Al.Mulnick@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'[ExchangeList]'" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 12:32:35 -0500
What? That the permissions will get corrupt?
Why is it even a possibility when your AV vendor recommends that you not do
this? If your AV vendor recommends otherwise, perhaps now is a good time to
reevanlutate and contact Microsoft to get that vendor corrected before they
do any damage.
That said, this q explains exactly what will likely happen (First regular
sentence after more information).
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=245822
-----Original Message-----
From: KEN MORRIS [mailto:KMORRIS@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 12:22 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] Reasons not to run normal AV on E2K server?????
http://www.MSExchange.org/
hello,
I know that I have read it somewhere, but cannot find the article, or
reference as to why. What I am looking for is supporting documentation to
show why A "Normal" AV solution will corrupt the E2K M drive. I have
searched through MS and not found what I wanted..... Can anyone supply me
with a reference to show that this is a fact? Thank you Ken
------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
Exchange FAQ: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
------------------------------------------------------
Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com No.1 ISA
Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org Windows Security Resource
Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/ Network Security Library:
http://www.secinf.net/ Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions:
http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
