RE: RES: permissions on e2k

  • From: "Gami, Paresh" <PGami@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 13:57:33 +0100

hi all,

how do you give send behalf of permissions in e2k, in 5.5 it was send as.

Thanks

Paresh

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Decarli [mailto:decarli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 29 May 2002 12:33
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] RES: Re: NAV for E2K set up


http://www.MSExchange.org/ - Re-Vamped!


Here, We're using NAV 3.0 for E2K,
and a additional resource that's block attachment.
You can to create a list that will have all types
of files extensions that can be blocked.
You still can to forward to quarentine server (that's a better solution) e to 
manage
the files and virus.

It's a Great Solution !!!



-----Mensagem original-----
De: Lee Swanson [mailto:swanson@xxxxxxxxxx]
Enviada em: terça-feira, 28 de maio de 2002 22:44
Para: [ExchangeList]
Assunto: [exchangelist] Re: NAV for E2K set up


http://www.MSExchange.org/ - Re-Vamped!


We use NAV and have an Exchange2K. This is how it is setup.... (We are a
network of around 50 users)

1. The NAV is installed on a member server. The E2K server has client for
NAV installed (the Exchsvr directories and log files are exempt from
scanning).

2. The NAV Exchange option is also installed on the E2K server where it
monitors the Exchange db. I do set the option to delete all infected
attachments -- do not even try and repair.

Hope this is helpful.
Lee
----- Original Message -----
From: "KEN MORRIS" <KMORRIS@xxxxxxx>
To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 6:33 PM
Subject: [exchangelist] NAV for E2K set up


http://www.MSExchange.org/ - Re-Vamped!


Hello,
We are having a debate here and I thought that the people out there who
are already using NAV would be the best to go to.

The debate is where NAV for E2K is installed in the network.

Scenario 1:
One thought is to install it on a W2K member server that has only one
other use. This is not the E2K server.

Scenario 2:
To install NAV directly on the E2K server. (It is also running AD, GC
and DNS but is not the PDC nor running the FSMO roles.

Which would be the best situation and what considerations should we be
looking at before installing NAV?

I remember reading that NAV for E2K has to go on the E2K server, but
have not located the supporting documentation to back me up on it. If
you can point me in the right direction it would be appreciated.

Thanks
Ken

------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this MSExchange.org Discussion List as:
swanson@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
$subst('Email.Unsub')


------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this MSExchange.org Discussion List as: 
decarli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')

------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this MSExchange.org Discussion List as: 
pgami@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Virus 
Control Centre.

This message is confidential and may contain privileged information. It is for 
the named intended recipient only. If you receive it in error please e-mail the 
sender at the address above to notify us and destroy the original message, not 
keeping a copy. It is possible for e-mails to be intercepted or affected by 
viruses. Whilst we maintain virus checks on inbound e-mails, we accept no 
liability for viruses or other material introduced with this message.
___________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Virus 
Control Centre.


Other related posts: