[ExchangeList] Re: [POSSIBLE SPAM] Re: Does 2003 require X400 addresses?

  • From: "Arnold, Jamie" <harnold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:45:13 -0500

Thanks.  I wasn't planning on deleting them.I've been around MS stuff too
long to fall for that one (VBG)  Just reviewing things and trying to
remember if they're actually used any more.
 
Thanks for the reply.
 
j
 
From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 10:36 AM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [POSSIBLE SPAM] [ExchangeList] Re: Does 2003 require X400
addresses?
Importance: Low
 
If you delete them, you'll regret it.
 
Exchange uses them for several things, perhaps most importantly to map a
user account to the mailbox object in the mailstore.
 
I think it would be true to say that Exchange no longer uses those addresses
for message routing.
 
  _____  

From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Arnold, Jamie
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 10:16 AM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] Does 2003 require X400 addresses?
 
I can't find anything that says this definitively, but it was my
understanding that Exchange 2003 and higher no longer uses X400 addressing
within the org and that SMTP addresses are all it requires to function.
True?
Thanks

Other related posts:

  • » [ExchangeList] Re: [POSSIBLE SPAM] Re: Does 2003 require X400 addresses?