Matt Welcome to the world of Exchange, I don't see anything wrong with running that hardware, if you could afford some more drives, to split the OS, and Transaction Logs away from the DB's that would be good. Mark Fugatt Dedicated Supportability Engineer (Exchange) Microsoft Services Organisation Desk: +44 (0)118 909 5630 Mobile: +44 (0)7966 858108 http://www.microsoft.com/support Dedicated to proactively supporting Microsoft's enterprise Customers This email may contain confidential information. If you are not named on the addressee list, please take no action in relation to this email, do not open any attachment, and please contact the sender (details above) immediately. Information in this email is provided in good faith. If you are a customer of Microsoft, please refer to the terms and conditions which cover the provision of support and consulting services to you/your organization. If you are not corresponding in the course of, or in connection with a Microsoft contract or program with its own terms and conditions, please note that no liability is accepted by Microsoft for the contents of this mail. -----Original Message----- From: Matt Robbins [mailto:mrobbins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 21 January 2005 16:02 To: [ExchangeList] Subject: [exchangelist] Moving to Exchange for the first time http://www.MSExchange.org/ Hi All, I am the network manager for a secondary school in England (11-18 year olds). Our current mail system (not Exchange) has gone end-of-life and I am looking at Exchange 2003 as a replacement. We need to support 100 users on Outlook 2003 on laptops - the staff- and a further 1200 students using Outlook Web Access. The usage by students is relatively light with peaks at the start of the day and at lunch and the end of school. All internal communications are carried out by email so the staff are somewhat heavier users. We intend to use the calendaring features of Exchange for which I have no estimate of usage as this is a feature we don't have at the moment. I have tried using processor and disk usage stats from the present system in the "size your server" formulae on the Microsoft Exchange website and it doesn't look good for the current mail server. Budgets are tight (what's new) therefore the server hardware I am thinking of would be of the order of twin 2.8GHz Xeon processors, 2GB RAM and three 36GB 15,000 RPM drives. I can honestly say I have no idea whether this will be up to the job so could one of you good people cast your experienced eyes over this and either congratulate me on an inspired guess or laugh and point! :-) Many thanks for your time. Matt Robbins Network Manager Brooke Weston City Technology College P: 01536 396366 F: 01536 396867 ------------------------------------------------------ List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp Exchange FAQ: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ ------------------------------------------------------ Other Internet Software Marketing Sites: World of Windows Networking: http://www.windowsnetworking.com Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/ Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/ Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com ------------------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to this MSEXchange.org Discussion List as: markfu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe visit http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx