Re: Mail flow within a forest

  • From: manjunath bn <manjunatha.bn@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:27:28 +0530

hi manjeet,

When routing groups are in separate administrative groups you probably
make use of  SMTP to route the messages.

with in single administrative group mail flowwill be taken care by RPC service.
again smtp is mandatory.

separate routing groups are needed if  exchange servers located in
different locations

manjunath

On 4/28/05, Manjeet Singh <Manjeet.Singh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  http://www.MSExchange.org/
>  
>  
> 
> Hi, 
> 
>   
> 
> . Is this mandatory to create a connector between two routing group for mail
> flow, when my two server are in separate routing group? 
> 
> My two routing group are under same administrative group. 
> 
>   
> 
> And what is the difference in mail flow when two routing groups are in
> separate administrative group? 
> 
>   
> 
>   
> 
> Manjeet
> ------------------------------------------------------
>  List Archives:
> http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
>  Exchange Newsletters:
> http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
>  Exchange FAQ:
> http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
>  ------------------------------------------------------
>  Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
>  World of Windows Networking:
> http://www.windowsnetworking.com
>  Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com
>  No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org
>  Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/
>  Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/
>  Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
>  ------------------------------------------------------
>  You are currently subscribed to this MSEXchange.org Discussion List as:
> manjunatha.bn@xxxxxxxxx
>  To unsubscribe visit
> http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
>  Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Other related posts: