RE: GFI Mailsecurity or Sybari Antigen ?

  • From: "Dolly Bareqet" <dolly@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:36:08 +0200

Hi,

I had also tested both of them. I used to use Symantec, wasn't so
friendly to my taste. I finally decided on Sybari since it uses more
engines. I have purchased the whole package but the anti Spam. For the
anti spam I'm using GFI mail essentials.

Regards,

Dolly

-----Original Message-----
From: Periyasamy, Raj [mailto:Raj.Periyasamy@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 9:28 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] GFI Mailsecurity or Sybari Antigen ?

http://www.MSExchange.org/

List,
We are evaluating a few products for gateway virus scanning. I am very
happy about Sybari Antigen for SMTP in general. But I just saw GFI
Mailsecurity, and it looks a very competitive product. However, I am not
able to get much feedback on the product. Can you experts give your
feedback on GFIMS. How does it perform when compared to NAI Webshield,
Symantec and Sybari ?


Regards,

Raj




------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
Exchange FAQ: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
------------------------------------------------------
Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com
No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org
Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/
Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/
Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
------------------------------------------------------




Other related posts: