RE: Exchange Server and POP/SMTP server coexistance for same domain

  • From: "Carl Houseman" <c.houseman@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'[ExchangeList]'" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 12:27:33 -0400

 
Seems to me... a redirect for the obsolete KB number to the consolidated KB
number would solve all problems.

  _____  

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:michael@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 8:01 AM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] RE: Exchange Server and POP/SMTP server coexistance
for same domain


Yes, and a consolidation could be requested. But once they consolidate an
article, they pull the one they decide is a "duplicate" and that can mess up
searches for months (plus invalidate references in magazines and books and
....). So, we've learned to not do that. We generally just ask that they
refer to each other instead - which these two do.

  _____  

From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.houseman@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 1:08 AM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] RE: Exchange Server and POP/SMTP server coexistance
for same domain


Hmm, that's interesting - two separate KB articles that pretty much cover
the same ground.

  _____  

From: Byron ....... [mailto:snail945@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 5:28 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] RE: Exchange Server and POP/SMTP server coexistance
for same domain


awesome.  i had just found 319759 which is testing out great as i type.
thanks again.byron
 
 
 <http://www.degaba.com>  

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Carl  <mailto:c.houseman@xxxxxxxxx> Houseman 
To: [ExchangeList] <mailto:exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 2:14 PM
Subject: [exchangelist] RE: Exchange Server and POP/SMTP server coexistance
for same domain


http://www.MSExchange.org/

Then this is your KB article:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=321721


Other related posts: