RE: Exchange Server Redundancy
- From: "Mulnick, Al" <Al.Mulnick@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'[ExchangeList]'" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:23:42 -0500
I never considered MCS to be more difficult than adding a third-party app.
Is that all it does? How does it make the recovery so fast? How does it
check for db consistency?
_____
From: Tiago de Aviz [mailto:Tiago@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 9:17 AM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] RE: Exchange Server Redundancy
http://www.MSExchange.org/
It is much simpler because it can be implemented on a single day, it
replicates data on the bit level, it's a cheap software, and if you want,
you can user a slower machine or any other machine for redundancy.
No, while Brightstor is replicating, it doesn't know if the file is a
database or a Star Wars movie. It's all the same for him.
Tiago de Aviz
SoftSell
(41) 340-2363
www.softsell.com.br <http://www.softsell.com.br/>
Esta mensagem, incluindo seus anexos, tem caráter confidencial e seu
conteúdo é restrito ao destinatário da mensagem. Caso você tenha recebido
esta mensagem por engano, queira por favor retorná-la ao destinatário e
apagá-la de seus arquivos. Qualquer uso não autorizado, replicação ou
disseminação desta mensagem ou parte dela é expressamente proibido. A
SoftSell não é responsável pelo conteúdo ou a veracidade desta informação.
_____
From: Mulnick, Al [mailto:Al.Mulnick@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: terça-feira, 9 de março de 2004 10:51
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] RE: Exchange Server Redundancy
http://www.MSExchange.org/
So, really, it's not much different than the MCS solution from Microsoft
except that a) it's replicating data on the bit level? and b) it's software
vs. hardware solution? I'm missing where it saves the time? It has to
ensure that the database is consistent right? Or does it?
_____
Other related posts:
